|
Please scroll down to read an exerpt from Water Marks.
The
Dastardly Creep and Jab Jim
McLennan
Golfers have the slice and fly-casters have the tailing loop. Both
are problems that will drive you crazy if you don’t fix them. The
tailing loop is encountered by nearly all fly fishers, and in order to
continue development as a caster it must be eliminated.
To view the video version of this story, click here
An exerpt from Water Marks A
Kid No More We showed Deanna how to cast with a Snoopy rod and reel in the backyard when she was about four, and shortly thereafter she began reeling in fish that Lynda or I hooked at a small pond near home. Eventually she learned to stop cranking the reel before the rod-tip poked the fish on the forehead. When she was seven or eight she entered the difficult stage when kids want to use a fly rod like their parents, but aren’t yet strong enough to cast with a fly rod. We maneuvered our way through this period by appointing her as our team’s official fish-netter and fish-releaser, which she viewed as important jobs, and which satisfied her, more or less, until she was able to handle a fly rod on her own. She caught her first fish with a fly rod on a rainy float trip in British Columbia when she was nine years old, and I recall clearly a few years later watching her hook, land, and release a number of westslope cutthroats from a side channel on the Elk River. A couple of years after that she stalked, hooked and landed her first big Bow River rainbow on a dry fly. Deanna was learning things through these years, but I was too. Most important for me was the realization that it would be very easy to push too hard. Though inside I hoped she’d become the next Joan Wulff, or the first female guide on the Bow River, or at least would marry a guy who fished with dry flies and hunted with pointing dogs, I sensed that I could drive my daughter away from fishing and hunting if I forced them upon her. Quite early I learned that every session of fishing should be accompanied by equal time for rock-throwing or bug-watching, and in some ways that hasn’t changed much. Last summer, when she was 16, we went on a father-and-daughter fishing trip. For two days we hiked along a brown trout stream that flows through a friend’s land in the western Alberta foothills. Fishing was - well, fishing. There wasn’t much activity except for a brief, but stellar episode with a good-sized brown trout and some pale morning duns. It took place at a shady bend in the stream where we could see the fish in the water. The fish was holding just under the surface beside a fallen spruce tree and was taking every bug that drifted over. On the third cast Deanna’s fly dropped just behind the trout. The fish must have heard the fly land, for it made an immediate pirouette and began to home in, coming right toward us. When the fish opened its mouth to take the fly, it was about 15 feet away, and we could see right down into its white gullet. We landed, photographed, and released the fish, and giggled about the dramatic way it came to the fly. When we got home Deanna told her mother that we’d had a great time on our trip, that our friend’s cabin on the creek was really neat, and that she really liked watching the beaver and the frog (“What beaver? What frog?” I thought). Then, not quite as an afterthought, but in obvious deference to her father, she added “and the fishing was pretty good too.” I have a theory about obsession: that its existence can be confirmed by the frequency with which you think about something when you’re not doing it. By this definition, I’m obsessed with hunting and fishing. Deanna is not. She likes them, she is quite skilled at them, but her life doesn’t revolve around them. If she is obsessed, it is with other things, some which might come from her parents – like her love of music and words, for instance – and others, like her passion for dance, which seem to have spontaneously appeared from the air. I have learned not to be disappointed with this. I have accepted the possibility, remote as it seems, that these other things could be as fascinating and rewarding and worthwhile to other people as fishing and hunting are to me. Through most of her youth Deanna seemed pretty content to hang out with her parents. We probably did an unusual number of activities together, of both a sporting and non-sporting nature. But late last summer when we were planning a family fishing holiday to the Missouri River in Montana, Deanna began to feel life’s pull toward other things. There was discussion about whether she would come with us or stay home and spend time with her friends. In the end we convinced her to come, and the trip was a success, but Lynda and I got the distinct sense that the next decision about her participation in such a trip would not be not be ours to make. We
have reached the point where my ability to stir a passion within my
daughter for hunting and fishing (and likely for anything else) has
ceased. If it isn’t in
there now, it’s too late to put it in. Her future interest in and pursuit of these things are beyond my
control. A friend wise in
these matters once told me that all we can do is introduce our kids to
fishing and shooting when they’re young, and then let them live their
lives. We shouldn’t be
surprised if they leave these sports behind while they’re focused on
schooling, careers, and spouses. But if they were introduced to field sports early, they are
likely to come back to them someday, and they might bring our
grandchildren with them when they do. ![]() This
fall we arranged for Deanna to skip an afternoon of school so she could
go bird hunting with me. She
missed a great chance at a cock pheasant because she forgot to take the
safety off, and on the way back to the car we startled a huge mule deer
buck at close range. On the
drive home, after I’d teased her sufficiently about missing the
pheasant, she said, “There’s always interesting stuff going on out
here, isn’t there?”
|